Unterwegs zur Theologie








Äɳë½Ã½º °³³äÀÇ Àι®ÇÐÀû ÇÔÀÇ
¡ª ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ »çȸÀû °¡´É¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¡ª


³í¹®ÀúÀÚ: Àü ö
³í¹®Á¤º¸: ½ÅÇаú»çȸ Á¦31Áý, 2017³â 2¿ù 28ÀÏ, pp.9-40.
³í¹®¹ßÇà: 21¼¼±â ±âµ¶±³»çȸ¹®È­¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì

Çѱۿä¾à:

Äɳë½Ã½º »çÀ¯ÀÇ Àç¹ß°ßÀº Áö³­ 20¼¼±â Á¾±³¿Í ¹®È­Àû À¯»êÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ Áøº¸ °¡¿îµ¥ ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Äɳë½Ã½ºÀÇ »çÀ¯°¡ ÀÚ¿¬°ú ¹®È­¿Í Àΰ£ »çȸ¿¡ ¾î¶°ÇÑ ÇÔÀǸ¦ Áö´Ï´ÂÁö °ËÅäÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀ̶ó´Â ½ÅÇÐÀûÀÎ ÅëÂûÀÌ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Àι®ÇÐÀû ÇÔÀǸ¦ Áö´Ï´ÂÁö °ËÅäÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. À¯´ë±³ÀÇ Ä«¹ß¶ó ÀüÅëÀº ½ÅÀÇ ¼¼°è âÁ¶¸¦ ±¸»óÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ »çº¯À¸·Î ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ ¹®Á¦¿¡ Á¢±ÙÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀº ¼º¼­Àû Àü½Â¿¡¼­ Àß µå·¯³­´Ù. ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµ´Â ½ÊÀÚ°¡ÀÇ Èñ»ýÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ÀÚ½ÅÀ» ºñ¿ü´Ù. ÀÌ ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© Çϳª´ÔÀº ¼¼»óÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯¿Í »ý¸íÀÇ ±Ù°Å¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ »ç¶ûÀº Çϳª´ÔÀÇ °¡Àå ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ ¸ð½ÀÀ¸·Î ¼º¼­Àû Àü½Â¿¡¼­ ¹¦»çµÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ º» ¿¬±¸´Â Äɳë½Ã½ºÀÇ À¯»êÀº Å« °¡Ä¡¸¦ Áö´Ñ Á¾±³Àû À¯»êÀ̸ç Çϳª´ÔÀÇ Ã¢Á¶¿Í ¼ºÀ°½ÅÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ µ¿·ÂÀÓÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ À¯»êÀÌ ¿À´ÃÀÇ »çȸü°è¿¡¼­ ¾î¶°ÇÑ À±¸®ÀûÀÌ¸ç ½ÇõÀû ÇÔÀǸ¦ Áö´Ï°í ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ´õ ³ª¾Æ°¡ Àΰ£ ¹®¸íÀ» »õ·Ó°Ô Ãßµ¿ÇÏ´Â »çȸÀû °¡´É¼ºÀ¸·Î¼­ ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ »çÀ¯°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô ¿¬°áµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ Èñ¸ÁÀÇ Àι®ÇÐÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ °ËÅäÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.



ÁÖ Á¦ ¾î Äɳë½Ã½º, ¾Æ¿ìÅäÆ÷¿¡½Ã½º, ÀÚ±âºñ¿ò, »çȸ, Àι®ÇÐ, ¹®¸í, ½ÅÇаú »çȸ



³í¹®¸ñÂ÷:

  1. µé¾î°¡¸ç
  2. Äɳë½Ã½º °³³ä°ú ¿ª»çÀû Çؼ®
  3. »ý¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ±Ù´ëÀÇ ¼¼ ÀÌ·Ð
    1. È­ÀÌÆ®ÇìµåÀÇ »ý¼ºÀÇ ÇüÀÌ»óÇÐ
    2. ´ÏŬ¶ó½º ·ç¸¸ÀÇ »ý¼ºÀÇ Ã¼°èÀÌ·Ð
  4. ¾Æ¿ìÅäÆ÷¿¡½Ã½º¿¡¼­ Äɳë½Ã½º·Î
    1. ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ ½ÅÇÐÀû ¸ð»ö
    2. ÀÚ±âºñ¿òÀÇ À±¸®Àû ¸ð»ö
  5. ÃÖÃÊÀÇ ½Å, ÃÖÈÄÀÇ »çȸ
    1. Äɳë½Ã½º¿Í ±¸¿øÀÇ °¡´É¼º
    2. Äɳë½Ã½º¿Í ÀÚÀ¯ÀÇ °øµ¿Ã¼
  6. ³ª°¡¸ç
  7. °á·Ð
  8. Âü°í¹®Çå
  9. Abstract







Kenosis: A View from the Humanities
¡ª On the Social Possibility of Self-Emptying


Author: Chun Chul
Source: Theology and Society, Vol. 31. (2017.2.28.), 9-40.
Publisher: Academy for 21th Century Christian Society & Culture

Abstract:

The development of kenotic thought was one of the most important advances in religious and cultural heritages in the late twentieth century. Focusing on the relevance of kenotic thought to some of the perennial questions about nature, culture and human society, this paper seeks to re-specify its theological meaning with a view on developing a concept of kenosis from a perspective informed by humanities. What, then, has been kenosis and into what did it develop? Jewish kenotic thoughts centered around the metamorphosis of God and human, and these expressions are evident in the Kabalistic tradition of zimzum. In the idea of Shekinah, "God¡¯s Indwelling", we see a biblical background: Christ sacrifices through Kenosis, which is self-realization as well as self-giving. In this kenotic process, God gives space for freedom, individuality and fullness of life. Kenotic love stands for the supreme ideal image of God. Kenosis, as this paper will show, is a valuable religious heritage. It is a creative force directly linked to divine creativity as well as incarnation. In the process of sharing my understanding on this concept which I align with the humanities for hope, I am aiming at contributing toward a deeper understanding on the foundation and meaning of freedom in human civilization.



Keyword Kenosis, Autopoiesis, Emptness, Society, Humanities, Civilization, Theology and Society











¡ª