|
¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ ´ëÈ ¡ª ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ º» ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇÐÀÇ »ý¸í·Ð ¿¬±¸ ¡ª
³í¹®ÀúÀÚ: Àü ö
³í¹®Á¤º¸: Á¶Á÷½ÅÇгíÃÑ Á¦46Áý, 2016³â 12¿ù 31ÀÏ, pp.247-274.
³í¹®¹ßÇà: Çѱ¹Á¶Á÷½ÅÇÐȸ
Çѱۿä¾à:
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ °£Çй®ÀûÀÎ ´ëÈ °¡´É¼ºÀ» ŸÁøÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÑ´Ù. ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇÐÀº °í³ÀÇ ÇöÀå¿¡¼ µ¶Ã¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ±¸ÇöµÈ Çѱ¹Àû ½ÅÇÐÀÌ´Ù. ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ ¸¸³²Àº µÎ °¡Áö Â÷¿ø¿¡¼ ¸ð»öµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ù ¹ø°, µÎ »çÀ¯ ¸ðµÎ ¡°ÇöÀ缺¡±ÀÇ ¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀûÀÎ ¸ð»öÀ» ±íÀÌ ÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù. µÎ ¹ø°, µÎ »çÀ¯ ¸ðµÎ ¡°»ý¸í¡±ÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ü°èÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ Á¢±ÙÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¦±â ¼Ó¿¡¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´ÙÀ½ÀÇ ³× °¡Áö ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. ù° ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÌ º¸Æí(universality)¿Í °³º°(individuality)ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ´Ù·ç¾ú´Â°¡. µÑ°, µÎ ÀÌ·ÐÀº Áß½É(center)°ú ÁÖº¯(margin)ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ´Ù·ç¾ú´Â°¡. ¼Â°, µÎ ÀÌ·ÐÀº »ý¸íÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ »çȸ¿Í ü°èÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ ¾î¶»°Ô ´Ù·ç¾ú´Â°¡. ³Ý°, µÎ ÀÌ·ÐÀº °í³°ú ¿¬´ë¼ºÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ´Ù·ç¾ú´Â°¡. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÌ µÎ ÀÌ·ÐÀÌ Ã¼°èÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼ »ý¸íÀÇ ÁöÀ§¸¦ ¸Å¿ì È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶¸íÇÏ´Â ´ã·ÐÀÓÀ» ÁÖÀåÇÏ¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ȯ°æ°ú »ý¸íÀÇ ÇÔ¼ö ¼Ó¿¡¼ ¹ÎÁßÀÇ Àǹ̸¦ »õ·Ó°Ô Çؼ®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿©Áö¸¦ ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ ´ëÈ¿¡¼ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. »ý¸íÀÇ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ Çö½Ç, »ý¸íÀÇ »çȸÀû ¿¬´ë¼ºÀÇ ´ã·Ð¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÅÇÐÀû ÀÛ¾÷ÀÌ ¿äûµÇ´Â Çö½Ç¿¡¼ ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ ´ëÈ´Â ¾ÕÀ¸·Îµµ ¸Å¿ì dz¿ä·Î¿î ¼º°ú¸¦ Á¦°øÇØÁÙ °ÍÀÓÀ» º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÁÖ¸ñÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÁÖ Á¦ ¾î
¹ÎÁß½ÅÇÐ, ü°èÀÌ·Ð, »ý¸í, ½Ã½ºÅÛ, ¿¬´ë¼º, »çȸ, ´ÏŬ¶ó½º ·ç¸¸
³í¹®¸ñÂ÷:
- µé¾î°¡¸ç
- ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇÐÀÇ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀû Ư¼º
- ±Ù´ëÀû »çÀ¯¿Í ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇÐ
- ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·ÐÀÇ ´ëÈ: »çȸ¿Í ü°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ºÂû
- »ý¸í´ã·ÐÀ¸·Î¼ÀÇ ¹ÎÁß½ÅÇаú ü°èÀÌ·Ð
- °íÅë°ú »ý¸íÀÇ ¿¬´ë¼º
- ³ª°¡¸ç
- °á·Ð
- Âü°í¹®Çå
- Abstract
Dialogue between Minjung Theology and System Theory ¡ª A Perspective on System Theory from the Definition of Life in Minjung Theology
Author: Chun Chul
Source: Korea Journal of Systematic Theology, Vol. 46. (2016.12.31.), 247-274.
Publisher: Korea Society of Systematic Theology
Abstract:
This study aims at elaborating the possibilities of interdisciplinary dialogues between Minjung Theology and the System Theory. Minjung Theology rose as a contextual theology amidst the reality of suffering. The encounter of Minjung Theology and System Theory can be explored through two different ways. Firstly, both thoughts are deeply focusing on the present aspect (currency). Secondly, both thoughts approach the concern of ¡°life¡± from the system-perspective. With these inquiries given, this study has elaborated on the following four aspects.
1) How did both Minjung Theology and System Theory deal with the definition of Universality and Individuality? 2) How did they deal with the issues of Center and Margin? 3) How did they deal with the issue of ¡°life¡± from the social point of view? 4) How did they interpret the quest of dealing with the issues of suffering and solidarity with it?
This study tries to elaborate a discourse on how these two thoughts are casting light on the status of life. The correlation of nature and life especially provides new ways of interpretation on the definition and meaning of Minjung in the contemporary discourse of theology. This study is focusing on the rich outcomes from the dialogue between these two thoughts, that responds to the urgent need for a discourse on solidarity of life on the social level and theological reflection of the same.
Keyword Minjung Theology, System Theory, Life, System, Solidarity, Society, Niklas Luhmann
|